Browse Articles

Article|08 Mar 2017|OPEN
Differential gene expression analysis of ‘Chili’ (Pyrus bretschneideri) fruit pericarp with two types of bagging treatments
Yuling Wang1,2 , Xinfu Zhang1,2 , Ran Wang1,2 , Yingxin Bai1,2 , Chenglian Liu1,2 , Yongbing Yuan1,2 , Yingjie Yang1,2 , Shaolan Yang,1,2 ,
1Department of Horticulture, Qingdao Agricultural University, Qingdao 266109, China
2Qingdao Key Laboratory of Genetic Improvement and Breeding in Horticultural Plants, Qingdao 266109, China
*Corresponding author. E-mail: shaolanyang@126.com

Horticulture Research 4,
Article number: 5 (2017)
doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/hortres.2017.5
Views: 871

Received: 08 Oct 2016
Revised: 13 Jan 2017
Accepted: 10 Feb 2017
Published online: 08 Mar 2017

Abstract

Preharvest bagging is a simple, grower-friendly and safe physical protection technique commonly applied to many fruits, and the application of different fruit bags can have various effects. To explore the molecular mechanisms underlying the fruit quality effects of different bagging treatments, digital gene expression (DGE) profiling of bagged and unbagged ‘Chili’ (Pyrus bretschneideri Rehd.) pear pericarp during development was performed. Relative to unbagged fruit, a total of 3022 and 769 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were detected in the polyethylene (PE)-bagged and non-woven fabric-bagged fruit, respectively. DEGs annotated as photosynthesis-antenna proteins and photosynthesis metabolism pathway were upregulated in non-woven fabric-bagged fruit but downregulated in the PE-bagged fruit. Non-woven fabric bagging inhibited lignin synthesis in ‘Chili’ pear pericarp by downregulating DEGs involved in phenylpropanoid biosynthesis; consequently, the fruit lenticels in non-woven fabric-bagged fruit were smaller than those in the other treatments. The results indicate that the non-woven fabric bagging method has a positive effect on the appearance of ‘Chili’ pear fruit but neither of the two bagging treatments is conducive to the accumulation of soluble sugar.