Browse Articles

Article|01 Aug 2020|OPEN
Thermal-responsive genetic and epigenetic regulation of DAM cluster controlling dormancy and chilling requirement in peach floral buds
Hong Zhu1,2 , Pao-Yang Chen3 , Silin Zhong4 , Chris Dardick1 , Ann Callahan1 , Yong-Qiang An5 , Steve van Knocker6 , Yingzhen Yang7 , Gan-Yuan Zhong7 and Albert Abbott8 , Zongrang Liu,1 ,
1USDA-ARS, Appalachian Fruit Research Station, Kearneysville, WV 25430, USA
2Key Laboratory of South China Agricultural Plant Molecular Analysis and Genetic Improvement, South China Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou 510650, China
3Institute of Plant and Microbial Biology, Academia Sinica, Taipei 11529, Taiwan
4The State Key Laboratory of Agrobiotechnology, School of Life Science, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong
5USDA-ARS, Plant Genetics Research Unit, Donald Danforth Plant Science Center, St Louis, MO 63132, USA
6Department of Horticulture, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48834, USA
7USDAARS, Grape Genetic Research Unit, Geneva, NY 14456, USA
8Forest Health Research and Education Center, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40546, USA
*Corresponding author. E-mail: Zongrang.liu@ars.usda.gov

Horticulture Research 7,
Article number: 114 (2020)
doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41438-020-0336-y
Views: 884

Received: 10 Jan 2020
Revised: 10 May 2020
Accepted: 22 May 2020
Published online: 01 Aug 2020

Abstract

The Dormancy-associated MADS-box (DAM) gene cluster in peach serves as a key regulatory hub on which the seasonal temperatures act and orchestrate dormancy onset and exit, chilling response and floral bud developmental pace. Yet, how different temperature regimes interact with and regulate the six linked DAM genes remains unclear. Here, we demonstrate that chilling downregulates DAM1 and DAM3–6 in dormant floral buds with distinct patterns and identify DAM4 as the most abundantly expressed one. We reveal multiple epigenetic events, with tri-methyl histone H3 lysine 27 (H3K27me3) induced by chilling specifically in DAM1 and DAM5, a 21-nt sRNA in DAM3 and a ncRNA induced in DAM4. Such induction is inversely correlated with downregulation of their cognate DAMs. We also show that the six DAMs were hypermethylated, associating with the production of 24-nt sRNAs. Hence, the chilling-responsive dynamic of the different epigenetic elements and their interactions likely define distinct expression abundance and downregulation pattern of each DAM. We further show that the expression of the five DAMs remains steadily unchanged or continuously downregulated at the ensuing warm temperature after chilling, and this state of regulation correlates with robust increase of sRNA expression, H3K27me3 and CHH methylation, which is particularly pronounced in DAM4. Such robust increase of repressive epigenetic marks may irreversibly reinforce the chilling-imposed repression of DAMs to ensure flower-developmental programming free from any residual DAM inhibition. Taken together, we reveal novel information about genetic and epigenetic regulation of the DAM cluster in peach, which will be of fundamental significance in understanding of the regulatory mechanisms underlying chilling requirement and dormancy release, and of practical application for improvement of plasticity of flower time and bud break in fruit trees to adapt changing climates.